Circular 230 Disclaimer & Other Disclosures

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter(s) addressed herein.

This blog is personal, reflects my own views and not the views of my employer, and has not be reviewed by my employer for completeness or accuracy.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Little Change for PCAOB Under High Court Ruling

Little Change for PCAOB Under High Court Ruling

The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision Monday in the constitutional challenge to the PCAOB will leave the agency virtually unchanged. The court’s ruling will not affect day-to-day operations of the PCAOB, the agency said.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion. In it, he said the court was isolating, or “severing,” from the rest of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act the one constitutional flaw the court found regarding the power to remove PCAOB members. “The consequence is that the [PCAOB] may continue to function as before, but its members may be removed at will by the [SEC],” said the Court’s summary of the decision.

The court also emphasized that all other provisions of the SOX will remain in effect. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act remains ‘fully operative as a law’ with these tenure restrictions excised,” the court said.

“The decision effectively fixes the constitutionality of the PCAOB by making board members subject to ‘at will’ removal by the SEC and therefore the president,” said AICPA President and CEO Barry Melancon. “It sustains the continued function of both the PCAOB and Sarbanes-Oxley.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Paradysz Matera